Consider
Statement-$1$: $(p \wedge \sim q) \wedge (\sim p \wedge q)$ is a fallacy.
Statement-$2$: $(p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim q \rightarrow \sim p)$ is a tautology.

  • A
    Statement-$1$ is false,Statement-$2$ is true
  • B
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is false
  • C
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true; Statement-$2$ is a correct explanation for Statement-$1$
  • D
    Statement-$1$ is true,Statement-$2$ is true; Statement-$2$ is not a correct explanation for Statement-$1$

Explore More

Similar Questions

Find the component statements of the following compound statement:
All rational numbers are real and all real numbers are complex.

The statement pattern $(p \lor q) \to \sim r$ is logically equivalent to

If two triangles are congruent,then their areas are equal. What is the contrapositive of the inverse of this statement? (Where $p$: Two triangles are congruent,$q$: Their areas are equal)

The number of switches in the alternative equivalent simple circuit for the given circuit is:

Write the negation of the following statement:
$s:$ There exists a number $x$ such that $0 < x < 1.$

Vedclass Products

For Students

Vedclass Test Series

Mock tests in real JEE/NEET style with performance analysis. 5-day free trial.

Start Free Trial
For Teachers

Exam Paper Generator

Generate Set A/B/C/D exam papers from 7.5L+ questions in 2 minutes. 3 chapters free.

Try Free
For Institutes

Online Exam Module

Live online exams with unlimited students, 360° analytics & white-label branding.

See Demo